Does that include a tough battle a margin of 10 , but where you pick up a TD late when they went for it on 4th? You would think you would have an algorithm for that to normalize the wins to a GG dataset
Does that include a tough battle a margin of 10 , but where you pick up a TD late when they went for it on 4th? You would think you would have an algorithm for that to normalize the wins to a GG dataset
I don't watch my games. I haven't watched them since v4.5 first came out. Maybe even on the tail end of v4.4. I have had zero interest in watching games for a long, long time. I look at the score & nothing more...... (occasionally I'll check the box score by quarters).
Re: 2039 Season GG Thread
by
Redneckgopher
@
10/05/2021 11:32 pm
CrazyRazor wrote:
I don't watch my games. I haven't watched them since v4.5 first came out. Maybe even on the tail end of v4.4. I have had zero interest in watching games for a long, long time. I look at the score & nothing more...... (occasionally I'll check the box score by quarters).
So you are saying you could have missed out on a really really good game that ended with a 17-18 point spread, and wouldn't have even offered the bloke a tongue in check "good game punk"
I will now have to rethink my priorities before I have a meltdown or according to Montgomery Burns, "an unrequested fission surplus."
Does that include a tough battle a margin of 10 , but where you pick up a TD late when they went for it on 4th? You would think you would have an algorithm for that to normalize the wins to a GG dataset
I don't watch my games. I haven't watched them since v4.5 first came out. Maybe even on the tail end of v4.4. I have had zero interest in watching games for a long, long time. I look at the score & nothing more...... (occasionally I'll check the box score by quarters).
Well that reminds me of those advanced Aliens that have merged male and females together into one ***......for all of them. I mean now they just simulate their offspring like those Boovs from the Home movie. My point is that they are missing the whole snap of the apple by thinking *** is just a useless waste of time. They forgot how good it is.
So you are saying you could have missed out on a really really good game that ended with a 17-18 point spread, and wouldn't have even offered the bloke a tongue in check "good game punk"
I will now have to rethink my priorities before I have a meltdown or according to Montgomery Burns, "an unrequested fission surplus."
In my opinion a game that ends with a deficit of more than 2 TD's is not a Good Game by the losing team.
I see no reason in reminding one or being reminded of that in a post.