punisher wrote:
GrandadB wrote:
Many are reluctant to take over a team that has been mis-managed by the Ai, the salary cap is always either exceeded, especially right after the draft or is very small, less than 2 mill open. The Reno Maurauders along with probly all the other 5 open teams are examples of that.
i dont think that has anything to do with it ......If anything i think either (1) People want to acclaim instance success where they look like the smartest person on the site or (2) people dont want that team on their history on the site because if it drags down their winning percentage or what not then it would make them look like a NOT a good owner or great owner.
One way to solve this issue is
(1) show those people that people have the greatest success when they have been with a team for awhile.
(2) Just because you took a team like that doesnt make you a bad owner it actually makes you look much better as owner that you are willingly and able to take on challenges that may mean you will appreciate that TITLE or what not that won MORE so over a team that was easy to win with and what not
What you might speak of might be true, Punisher, if the Coach was a Teen/Millennium (instant success/gratification). I have taking over a good few teams below .500, with minimal draft picks (but with some advice) and put them on the right path.
What I will
NOT do, and I know your post is not about me in general, is to take over a team that is Cap flawed by the design of the game (Renegotiation Wizard)....if others want to go down that path, then that is for them. If Coaches continue to do that, they are guilty in buying into the flaws of the non-playing/gameplan aspects. In essence, you are advocating a "challenge" to right a wrong in the Roster management of flaws of the game.
It's not like this has not been pointed out to JDB before!
Last edited at 6/28/2019 1:44 pm